<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Conserving Memory &#187; health</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.conmem.ca/tag/health/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.conmem.ca</link>
	<description>A Critical Timeline in Conservation of Public Memory</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 18:23:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Conservatives Bring Woe to Women</title>
		<link>http://www.conmem.ca/2010/02/23/conservatives-bring-woe-to-women/</link>
		<comments>http://www.conmem.ca/2010/02/23/conservatives-bring-woe-to-women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 04:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Chalifour</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[g8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women's rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conmem.ca/?p=459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Harper has made it public that he&#8217;d like the Conservative government to put women&#8217;s health issues first, while hosting the G8. Nice, but unfortunately this is coming from someone who&#8217;s party has largely worked in the reverse direction. The Conservatives&#8217; history has not only neglected women&#8217;s issues, but reveals programs originally designed to help, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen Harper has made it public that he&#8217;d like the Conservative government to put women&#8217;s health issues first, while hosting the G8. Nice, but unfortunately this is coming from someone who&#8217;s party has largely worked in the reverse direction. The Conservatives&#8217; history has not only neglected women&#8217;s issues, but reveals programs originally designed to help, instead cut. <span id="more-459"></span></p>
<p>According to the National Union of Public and General Employees <a title="Stephen Harper's breach of promise to Canadian women" href="http://www.nupge.ca/news_2007/n28ja07a.htm">(NUPGE) 28 January<sup>1</sup> 2007</a>, Harper committed in 2006 to</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;. . . support women&#8217;s human rights and I agree that Canada has to do more to meet its international obligations to women&#8217;s equality. If elected I will take concrete and immediate measures, as recommended by the United Nations, to ensure that Canada fully upholds its commitments to women.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Instead, he started off by cutting 43% of the operating budget from the Status of Women Canada by closing 12 of the federal agency&#8217;s 16 offices. But that&#8217;s just to start.</p>
<p>Consider this column in the <a title="Harper's defence of women rings hollow" href="http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/opinion/columnists/harpers-defence-of-women-rings-hollow-83997992.html">Winnipeg Free Press<sup>2</sup> (10 February 2010)</a> about Harper&#8217;s Conservatives&#8217; deeds.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;In late summer 2006, the Conservatives killed the internationally acclaimed $2.75-million <a title="Conmem.ca post on the court challenges program" href="http://www.conmem.ca/2006/09/28/court-challenges-program/">Court Challenges Program</a> created in 1978 to provide federal funding for women and minorities to fight systemic inequality and discrimination. . . .</p>
<p>Also that year, they removed the advancement of women&#8217;s equality from the mandate of Status of Women Canada. . .</p>
<p>They have been diligently rewriting Canada&#8217;s foreign affairs language to erase advocacy and empowerment. The phrase &#8220;gender equality&#8221; has been replaced with &#8220;equality of men and women.&#8221; Currently, the federal cabinet is being lobbied by a group of its own backbenchers to end funding to the International Planned Parenthood Federation.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>The article points out that in order to advance women&#8217;s health, you need to take into account the various interconnected issues that contribute to health problems, particularly with respect to rights covering &#8220;. . . sexual violence, child marriage, sexual trafficking, female genital mutilation and lack of economic autonomy, political representation, land rights and inheritance rights&#8221; Unfortunately the Conservatives continue to be less than great proponents for birth control or abortion safety.</p>
<p>The <a title="CLC" href="http://www.canadianlabour.ca/">Canadian Labour Congress (CLC)</a> is making press with its <strong><a title="Reality check on womens equality" href="http://www.canadianlabour.ca/sites/default/files/2010-02-22-Canada-Beijing15-NGO-Report-EN.pdf">report (PDF)</a></strong> on the backwards slide of women&#8217;s status in Canada since 2004. The <a title="Women lose ground in push for equality" href="http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2010/02/22/women-gender-equality-un.html">CBC published news<sup>3</sup> (23 February 2010)</a> about this report</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Women currently account for 22.1 per cent of members of Parliament, even though they make up just over 50 per cent of the population. And while that&#8217;s the highest political participation rate for women in Canadian history, it&#8217;s inched up only marginally over the past dozen years.</p>
<p>The report also slams the government for scrapping a nascent $5 billion over five years national child care program and contends that &#8220;senior advisers within the office of the prime minister [have] strong links to anti-feminist organizations.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s true that there are some areas in which we&#8217;ve seen slight improvements such as better access to higher education but the larger setbacks are the more telling story. Consider the <a title="The Global Gender Gap Report 2009" href="http://www.weforum.org/en/Communities/Women%20Leaders%20and%20Gender%20Parity/GenderGapNetwork/index.htm">World Economic Forum&#8217;s Gender Gap</a> reports. As you can see from this image from <strong><a title="Full Report - 2009 WEF Gender Gap Analysis" href="http://www.weforum.org/pdf/gendergap/report2009.pdf">the report (PDF)</a></strong>, Canada has dropped to 25th in 2009 from 14th in 2006 in terms of worsening gender inequality.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.conmem.ca/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/wef-greportimage.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-465" title="wef-greportimage" src="http://www.conmem.ca/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/wef-greportimage.png" alt="" width="480" height="254" /></a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s also clear that Canada is behind the sample average on the economy, education, and health: that&#8217;s three out of four of the dimensions being graphed.</p>
<p>The <a title="Canadian women's rights in decline, report says" href="http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/769954--canadian-women-s-rights-in-decline-report-says">Toronto Star<sup>4</sup> (23 February 2010)</a> also reported on the topic. It focused more on some of the differences over the last several years, leading to the reports claims that we&#8217;ve seen an erosion in the status of women.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Kathy Lahey, a professor of law and gender studies at Queen&#8217;s University, whose research is part of the report sent to the UN this week, says Canada can&#8217;t claim many bragging rights.</p>
<p>She points out, for instance, that while more women may be in the workforce and at post-secondary institutions, their wage gap with men was actually worse in 2001 than it was in 1981. . .&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>There may be a lot of different factors contributing to these declines, but it&#8217;s clear that the concrete cuts Conservatives have made to federal programs assisting women, do not help. If Harper really wants Canada to lead on women&#8217;s health, he&#8217;s got to do more than doublespeak on an international stage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conmem.ca/2010/02/23/conservatives-bring-woe-to-women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

